Search

The Decentralization of Wage Bargaining

PublicationBook chapter
Arbetsmarknad, Centralisering, Henrik Malm Lindberg, Kollektivavtal, Löneförhandling, Nils Karlson, OECD

Abstract

The paper contributes to the discussion about the possible trends and processes towards decentralization of wage bargaining or wage setting within the OECD-countries since the 1970s. Based on a data set of 16 OECD countries from 1950 to 2000 our results show that in terms of bargaining level the trend is clear towards decentralization since the 1970s, even though there are important exceptions. In terms of confederal involvement the major decrease occurs among the Nordic countries and the Netherlands, whereas many of the other countries have had a status quo more or less. In terms of government involvement, however, the change is the almost non-existent. The overall tendency is still towards less centralisation, even though a number of countries have not changed or have moved in the opposite direction. Sweden, Denmark, UK and the Netherlands experience the largest decreases in decentralization overall. The processes of decentralization of wage bargaining look very differently in each country. It may occur through changes in the collective agreements themselves or through individual wage-setting outside the system of collective agreements. And the decentralization process may occur both in a context of cooperation between the labor-market organizations or in a setting of conflicts.

Related content: Working Paper No. 178

Lindberg, H. & Karlson, N. (2012). ”The Decentralization of Wage Bargaining: Four Cases.” In Lindberg, H. & Karlson, N. (Eds.)Labour Markets at a Crossroads. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.


Similar content

The Idea Vacuum of Liberalism and the Quest for Meaning and Community
Article (with peer review)Publication
Karlson, N.
Publication year

2019

Abstract

Liberalism is losing ground, while populist or even authoritarian nationalist regimes are on the rise. This article argues that the causes of the decline are, at least partly, endogenous, that a narrow focus on economic efficiency and the successful critique of socialism and the welfare state have created an idea vacuum that has opened up for these illiberal tendencies. The conclusion is that a central challenge for liberalism is to offer a comprehensive idea and narrative about meaning and community that is not socialist, conservative or nationalist, but distinctly liberal, to counter these developments.

Working Paper No. 333: Balancing employment protection and what’s good for the company
Working paperPublication
Stern, C. & Weidenstedt, L.
Publication year

2020

Published in

Ratio Working Paper

Abstract

Like most developed countries, Sweden has institutionalized employment protection legislation, called LAS. LAS is interesting theoretically because parts of it are semi-coercive. The semi-coerciveness makes it possible for firms and unions under collective agreements to negotiate departures from the law, for instance regarding seniority rules and terminations due to employees’ fit and/or misconduct. In this sense, the law is more flexible than the legal text suggests. The present study explores how the semi-coercive institution of employment protection is perceived and implemented by managers of smaller manufacturing companies. The results suggest that managers support the idea of employment protection rules in principle but face a difficult balancing act in dealing with LAS. Thus, the institutional legitimacy of the law is low. LAS ends up producing local cultures of hypocrisy and pretense. The paper gives insights into how institutions aimed at producing good moral behavior sometimes end up producing the opposite.

Framtidens kollektivavtal? Medarbetaravtal ur parternas perspektiv
ReportsPublication
Stern, C. & Paulsson, E.
Publication year

2019

Published in

Arbetsmarknadsprogrammet

Abstract

I denna intervjustudie om arbetsmarknadens parters erfarenheter av medarbetaravtal undersöks hur parterna upplever att medarbetaravtal fungerar samt om avtalsformen är bättre lämpad för framtidens utmaningar än traditionella kollektivavtal. Förändringar på arbetsmarknaden sätter den svenska kollektivavtalsmodellen på prov. Kollektivavtalens uppdelning mellan ”arbetare” och ”tjänstemän”, liksom uppdelningen mellan ”tjänstemän” och ”akademiker” kan tänkas upprätthålla murar där gränser i praktiken allt oftare överskrids. I denna kontext är medarbetaravtal en innovation som utmanar befintliga spelregler. Den här rapporten syftar till att studera hur en sådan innovation fungerar i praktiken. Den underliggande frågan är huruvida historiska spår är så upptrampade att de hindrar kollektivavtalens utveckling. Vår intervjuundersökning visar att medarbetaravtal är en ovanlig avtalsform i Sverige, och parternas berättelser om avtalen tyder på att medarbetaravtal fungerar relativt väl när det väl är på plats. I det stora hela råder samsyn mellan parterna om fördelarna respektive utmaningarna med gemensamma avtal. Det råder också samsyn kring framtiden som man inte tror kommer att präglas av medarbetaravtal.

Show more