Working Paper No. 112. The Political Opinions of Swedish Social Scientists

PublicationWorking paper
Akademiker, Charlotta Stern, Företagandets villkor, Henrik Jordahl, Niclas Berggren, Partisympati, Samhällsvetare
Working Paper No. 112.


We study the political opinions of Swedish social scientists in seven disciplines. A survey was sent to 4,301 academics at 25 colleges and universities, which makes the coverage of the disciplines included more or less comprehensive. When it comes to party sympathies there are 1.3 academics on the right for each academic on the left—a sharp contrast to the situation in the United States, where Democrats greatly dominate the social sciences. The corresponding ratio for Swedish citizens in general is 1.1. The most left-leaning disciplines are sociology and gender studies, the most right-leaning ones are business administration, economics, and law, with political science and economic history somewhere in between. The differences between the disciplines are smaller in Sweden than in the more polarized U.S. We also asked 14 policy questions. The replies largely confirm the pattern of a left-right divide – but overall the desire to change the status quo is tepid.

Related content: The Political Opinions of Swedish Social Scientists

Berggren, N., Jordahl, H. & Stern, C. (2007). The Political Opinions of Swedish Social Scientists. Ratio Working Paper No. 112.

Similar content

Managers on balancing employment protection and what’s good for the company: Intended and unintended consequences of a semi-coercive institution
Article (with peer review)Publication
Stern, C., & Weidenstedt, L.
Publication year


Published in

Economic and Industrial Democracy.


Sweden’s institutionalized employment protection legislation, ‘LAS’, is interesting theoretically because parts of it are semi-coercive. The semi-coerciveness makes it possible for firms and unions under collective agreements to negotiate departures from the law. Thus, the law is more flexible than the legal text suggests. The present study explores intended and unintended consequences of LAS as experienced by managers of smaller manufacturing companies. The results suggest that managers support the idea of employment protection in principle but face a difficult balancing act in dealing with LAS. From their point of view, the legislation’s institutional legitimacy is low, producing local cultures of hypocrisy and pretense. The article gives insights into how institutions aimed at specific, intended behavior sometimes end up producing unintended consequences fostering the opposite.

The article in total can be read here.

Sex differences and occupational choice. Theorizing for policy informed by behavioral science.
Article (with peer review)Publication
Stern, C., & Madison, G.
Publication year


Published in

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 202, 694-702.


Occupations are segregated with respect to sex, even in modern, egalitarian societies. There are strong pressures to eliminate segregation and therefore strong reasons to correctly theorize why segregation persists. The dominant view underpinning most public policies is essentially that environmental factors nudge women and men into different occupational paths. Nudging, however, ignores research suggesting that psychological traits that influence occupational choice differs between women and men, on average.

Some of the most well-documented and persistent average sex differences between men and women suggest that the taken-for-granted assumption that an egalitarian society would exhibit a more or less equal distribution of men and women across the occupational landscape may be mistaken. Rather, models of occupational choice informed by individual differences in preferences, broadly understood, would help us better explain how men and women behave in the labor market. Differences in occupational preferences will affect choices. Therefore, differences in proportions of women and men across professions may be in line with an egalitarian society and the well-being and best interest of both men and women in society.

The article can be read here.

Show more

Ratio is an independent research institute that researches how the conditions of entrepreneurship can be developed and improved.

Sveavägen 59 4trp

Box 3203

103 64 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578