Search

Working paper No. 270: The “Sugar Rush” from Innovation Subsidies. A Robust Political Economy Perspective

PublicationWorking paper
Alice Hallman, Anders Gustafsson, Andreas Stephan, Företagandets villkor, Nationalekonomi, Nils Karlson, Politisk ekonomi, Public Choice
ag_as_nk_ah_sugar_rush_innovation_subsidies_270
Download

Abstract

The governments of most advanced countries offer some type of financial subsidy to encourage firm innovation and productivity. This paper analyzes the effects of innovation subsidies using a unique Swedish database that contains firm level data for the period 1997-2011, specifically information on firm subsidies over a broad range of programs. Applying causal treatment effect analysis based on matching and a diff-in-diff approach combined with a qualitative case study of Swedish innovation subsidy programs, we test whether such subsidies have positive effects on firm performance. Our results indicate a lack of positive performance effects in the long run for the majority of firms, albeit there are positive short-run effects on human capital investments and also positive short-term productivity effects for the smallest firms. These findings are interpreted from a robust political economy perspective that reveals that the problems of acquiring correct information and designing appropriate incentives are so complex that the absence of significant positive long-run effects on firm performance for the majority of firms is not surprising.
Related content: The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: a robust political economy perspective

Gustafsson, A., Stephan, A., Hallman, A., & Karlson, N. (2016). The “Sugar Rush” from Innovation Subsidies. A Robust Political Economy Perspective. Ratio Working Paper No. 270. Stockholm: Ratio.


Similar content

Myten om centralisering – Om sjukvården som ett polycentriskt system
ReportsPublication
Karlson, N. & Lundbäck, M.
Publication year

2021

Published in

Ratioakademiens sjukvårdsprojekt

Abstract

Sammanfattning:
Syftet med denna rapport är att analysera sjukvården utifrån ett polycentriskt perspektiv, i jämförelse med ett monocentriskt, mer centraliserat, samt att diskutera hur ökade polycentriska inslag skulle kunna utveckla svensk vård och omsorg. Författarnas hypotes är att vård- och omsorgssystem som utmärks av en mångfald av finansiärer och utförare, med stora inslag av valfrihet och spritt ansvar, klarar vårduppdraget lika bra eller bättre än mer centraliserade och helt skattefinansierade system.

Ratio Working Paper No 343: Populism, Liberalism and the Quest for Meaning and Community
Working paperPublication
Karlson, N.
Publication year

2020

Abstract

Liberalism is losing ground, while populist or even authoritarian nationalist regimes are on the rise. This paper argues that the causes of the decline are, at least partly, endogenous, that a narrow focus on economic efficiency and the successful critique of socialism and the welfare state have created an idea vacuum that has opened up for these illiberal tendencies. The conclusion is that a central challenge for liberalism is to offer a comprehensive idea and narrative about meaning and community that is not socialistic, conservative or nationalistic, but distinctly liberal, to counter these developments.

Show more

Postgiro: 382621-1

|

Bankgiro: 512-6578