PublicationArticle (with peer review)

Regularized conditional estimators of unit inefficiency in stochastic frontier analysis, with application to electricity distribution market

Abstract

In stochastic frontier analysis, the conventional estimation of unit inefficiency is based on the mean/mode of the inefficiency, conditioned on the composite error. It is known that the conditional mean of inefficiency shrinks towards the mean rather than towards the unit inefficiency. In this paper, we analytically prove that the conditional mode cannot accurately estimate unit inefficiency, either. We propose regularized estimators of unit inefficiency that restrict the unit inefficiency estimators to satisfy some a priori assumptions, and derive the closed form regularized conditional mode estimators for the three most commonly used inefficiency densities. Extensive simulations show that, under common empirical situations, e.g., regarding sample size and signal-to-noise ratio, the regularized estimators outperform the conventional (unregularized) estimators when the inefficiency is greater than its mean/mode. Based on real data from the electricity distribution sector in Sweden, we demonstrate that the conventional conditional estimators and our regularized conditional estimators provide substantially different results for highly inefficient companies.

The article can be accessed here.

Zeebari, Z., Månsson, K., Sjölander, P., & Söderberg, M. (2023). Regularized conditional estimators of unit inefficiency in stochastic frontier analysis, with application to electricity distribution market. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 59(1), 79-97.

Details

Author: Zeebari, Z., Månsson, K., Sjölander, P., & Söderberg, M.
Publication year: 2023
Published in: Journal of Productivity Analysis, 59(1), 79-97.

Related

Professor
Magnus Söderberg
magnus.soderberg@ratio.se

Similar content

A penalization approach for estimating inefficiency in stochastic frontier panel models

Tchatoka, F. D., Söderberg, M., Hakeem, M. A.

Publication year

2025

Published in

University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy Working Paper.

Abstract

Efficiency analysis is essential for evaluating the performance of entities that deliver essential or standardized services. The estimator proposed by Jondrow et al. (1982) is widely used in this context, but it has been criticized for several shortcomings: it tends to bias inefficiency estimates toward the mean, distorts the distribution, and misrepresents the conditional distribution of inefficiency—especially in cross-sectional data.

Zeebari et al. (2023) propose a regularization-based alternative that aligns sample and theoretical moments; however, this method is primarily designed for cross-sectional applications and does not extend naturally to panel data.

In response, this paper introduces a penalized mode estimator for unit inefficiency in panel data. The estimator accounts for heteroskedasticity in both inefficiency and idiosyncratic errors. A closed-form expression is derived, and Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate its superior performance compared to existing methods. An empirical application using data from electricity providers in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand highlights the practical advantages of the proposed approach.

Article (with peer review)

Scale properties and efficient network structures in the Swedish electricity distribution market

Söderberg, M., Vesterberg, M.

Publication year

2025

Published in

Journal of Regulatory Economics

Abstract

This paper examines the Swedish electricity distribution sector to highlight three key findings. First, we identify significant economies of scale among electricity distribution firms, indicating that larger firms operate more efficiently. Second, we explore alternative market structures and demonstrate that these can substantially reduce the aggregated costs of electricity distribution. Third, we use novel survey data to show that firms perceive the economic incentives for mergers to be insufficient. These findings suggest that policymakers should consider creating a regulatory environment that encourages consolidation and enhance efficiency in the sector.

Article (with peer review)

Are CEOs judged on how cost efficient their firms are?

Månsson, K., Qasim, M., Söderberg, M.

Publication year

2025

Published in

Energy Economics

Abstract

This paper investigates whether executive boards consider firm-specific inefficiencies when they change CEOs in the Swedish electricity distribution sector. Firm-level inefficiencies are calculated using data from all Swedish electricity distributors from 2001 to 2022 and a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach.

DEA has advantages over standard financial key performance indicators since it controls for heterogeneity in inputs and outputs. It is also frequently employed by energy regulators to calculate relative cost inefficiencies.

Our baseline approach uses a multilevel model and investigates the relationship between inefficiency and CEO between-effects. This analysis shows that 9–15 % of the variation in inefficiency can be attributed to the CEO effect.

The second modeling approach quantifies the CEO effect using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach, focusing on firms that have changed CEOs. The results reveal that new CEOs reduce cost inefficiency more when they succeed CEOs who were forced to leave.