Ratio is an interdisciplinary research institute, with a research focus on the conditions of business and enterprise.

+4684415900

info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

Box 3203

103 64 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

Swedish flag iconSV
Swedish flag iconSV

Innovationspolitik – ett överutbud av stöd och hinder?

PublicationArticle (without peer review)
Christian Sandström, Financing of Innovations, Innovationspolitik, Jan Jörnmark, Klara Hvarfner, Martin Björklund

Abstract

Innovationspolitiken har fått mer uppmärksamhet, och i den här artikeln sammanfattar vi några av de resultat som kommit fram på senare år. Vi använder även en del nationalekonomisk teori för att förklara varför innovationspolitiken har blivit så förknippad med olika former av stöd snarare än en politik för ett bättre företagsklimat, trots att stöden verkar ha begränsade effekter.

Sandström, C., Jörnmark, J., Björklund, M. & Hvarfner, K. (2019). Innovationspolitik – ett överutbud av stöd och hinder?. Ekonomisk debatt, 2019(7), 67-70.

Details

Author

Sandström, C., Jörnmark, J., Björklund, M. & Hvarfner, K.

Publication year

2019

Published in

Ekonomisk debatt


About

  • About us
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Media
  • News archive
  • Cooperations
  • Eli F. Heckscher Lectures

Research

  • Areas
  • Labour Market Research
  • Competitiveness Research
  • Climate and Environmental Research
  • Ongoing research
  • Working Paper Series
People

Publications

  • Publications
  • Publications

About

  • About us

    • About
    • Contact us
  • Media

    • News archive
  • Cooperations

    • Eli F. Heckscher Lectures

Research

  • Areas

    • Labour Market Research
    • Competitiveness Research
    • Climate and Environmental Research
  • Ongoing research

    • Working Paper Series
  • People
  • Publications

    • Publications

      • Publications

    Selected publication

    Absolute income mobility and the effect of parent generation inequality: An extended decomposition approach
    Liss, E., Korpi, M., & Wennberg, K.

    Selected publication

    No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion
    Grafström, J., & Poudineh, R.
    Search
    Search

    Similar content

    Introducing the inverted Icarus paradox in business history – Evidence from David and Goliath in the Swedish telecommunications industry 1981–1990
    Article (with peer review)Publication
    Eriksson, K.; Lakomaa, E.; Nykvist, R.; Sandström, C.
    Publication year

    2024

    Published in

    Business History, Advance online publication.

    Abstract

    Previous research in business and management history has identified the Icarus paradox, which describes how organisations may fall due to overconfidence and hubris. We build upon previous research on paradoxes in business history and introduce the notion of an inverted Icarus paradox. Using rich archival sources coded in a relational database, we show how an entrant firm, Comvik, outmanoeuvred an established government monopoly in the non-market domain from 1980 to 1990, despite inferior resources and a weak market position. The government monopoly Televerket faced an inverted Icarus paradox; it could not leverage its strengths and political connections as they were stuck in a David versus Goliath narrative where public opinion was more sympathetic to the entrant firm Comvik.

    Learning from Overrated Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Seven Takeaways
    Book chapterPublication
    Henrekson, M., Sandström, C., & Stenkula, M.
    Publication year

    2024

    Published in

    Springer Nature.

    Abstract

    This chapter integrates findings from several different case studies on mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs) and makes use of the existing literature to briefly describe three other missions: The War on Cancer, homeownership in the United States, and the Swedish Million Program. Together with the analyses in the other chapters of this volume, seven takeaways regarding mission-oriented innovation policies are developed and described: (1) wicked problems cannot be solved through missions, (2) politicians and government agencies are not exempt from self-interest, (3) MOIPs are subject to rent seeking and mission capture, (4) policymakers lack information to design MOIPs efficiently, (5) MOIPs distort competition, (6) government support programs distort incentives and result in moral hazard, and (7) MOIPs ignore opportunity costs. These seven takeaways are illustrated using the cases described in this chapter and elsewhere in this volume.

    The state of the entrepreneurial state: Empirical evidence of mission-led innovation projects around the globe. In Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy (pp. 125–143)
    Book chapterPublication
    Batbaatar, M., Larsson, J. P., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, K.
    Publication year

    2024

    Published in

    In Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy (pp. 125–143). Springer.

    Abstract

    This chapter reviews theoretical rationales for mission-oriented innovation policy and provides an empirical overview of extant 28 papers and 49 cases on the topic. We synthetize varieties of mission formulations, actors involved, and characteristics of missions described as more or less failed or successful. Fifty-nine percent of the studied missions are still ongoing, 33 percent are considered successful, and 8 percent as failures. Sixty-seven percent of the studied missions have taken place in Europe, 24 percent in North America, and 8 percent in Asia. The majority of innovation projects referred to as missions do not fulfill the criteria defined by the OECD. Results suggest that missions related to technological or agricultural innovations are more often successful than broader types of missions aimed at social or ecological challenges. Challenges regarding the governance and evaluation of missions remain unresolved in the literature. We find no case that contains a cost-benefit analysis or takes opportunity cost into account.

    Show more