Ratio logo white

Ratio is an interdisciplinary research institute, with a research focus on the conditions of business and enterprise.

08-441 59 00info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

11359 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

PublicationsSeminarsPeople

Popular

News archive
Publications
Seminars
People
Start
About
Contact us
Labour market research
Competitiveness research
Climate and environmental research
Swedish flag iconPå svenska
PublicationArticle (with peer review)

Political discrimination in hiring: Evidence from a large field experiment

Abstract

Political polarization is a pressing societal issue, and this study examines whether political affiliation-related discrimination exists in hiring, a mechanism that could exacerbate polarization. Following the 2022 general election we conducted a field experiment in Sweden, submitting 11,461 fictitious applications to test whether political participation affects employer responses. Linking experimental observations to local political environments using administrative and voting data, we find that listing political affiliation reduces the probability of a positive employer response by about 2 percentage points. This penalty is consistent across the left- and right blocs, although for right bloc parties it is driven by affiliation with the populist Sweden Democrats and varies with local voting patterns. This discrimination is concentrated in urban labor markets, with no evidence of political penalties in rural municipalities. Effects differ by applicant background, with Arab men experiencing a positive effect from disclose political affiliation while other groups face penalties. These findings highlight the role of political affiliation-based discrimination in deepening polarization and suggest that employers may unwittingly reinforce societal divides through their hiring practices.

Sinclair, S., & Granberg, M. (2026). Political discrimination in hiring: Evidence from a large field experiment. Political Psychology, 47, e70133. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70133

Details

Author
Sinclair, S. & Granberg, M.
Publication year
2026
Published in

Political Psychology


Similar content

Working paper

Ratio Working Paper No. 390: Fighting Populism by Rethinking Welfare

Karlson, N.
Download

Publication year

2026

Published in

Ratio Working Paper Series.

Abstract

Populism thrives on discontent. It could be anything from migration and xenophobia to globalization and welfare failures. Populists deliberately use such discontent to promote polarization by demonizing opponents and attacking media, established elites, courts etc. in the name of the “true people”. As a consequence, democracy, the rule of law, and sound social and economic policies are undermined, with long-term disastrous effects. In many cases, however, the original discontent is caused by real policy failures that have not been properly solved. A major strategy for fighting back at the populist threats therefore must be to improve policy. This paper focuses on the policy failures of welfare states, a major source of discontent in many democracies. I argue that the concept of welfare has been captured and misinterpreted into government assistance programs, a presumption that needs to be abandoned and replaced by interpreting welfare as human flourishing, something that primarily can be promoted within markets and civil society, supported by a small, limited, and decent state.

Working paper

Ratio Working Paper No. 389: Parenthood and the Gender Gap in Academic Careers

Ejermo, O., & Holmström, P.
Download

Publication year

2026

Published in

Ratio Working Paper Series.

Abstract

Using population-wide data on Swedish university researchers and teachers, we identify the effects of parenthood on academic careers. Leveraging staggered event-study models that compare mothers and fathers around first birth, we document widening gender gaps in publication output, wage income, promotion, and PhD completion. These gaps arise across all scientific fields. We further document substantial gender differences prior to first birth and among never-parents, indicating that child-related penalties explain only part of the overall academic gender gap.

Article (with peer review)

Competition and Voice in Public Education: Evidence from Sweden

Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Lakomaa, E., & Brandén, M.

Publication year

2026

Published in

Education Finance and Policy, 1-40

Abstract

While numerous studies examine the effects of school competition on student performance, little research directly addresses a key critique of competition: its potential to negatively affect parental engagement and voice. We draw on Hirschman’s theory of voice to argue that voucher-based school competition increases opportunities for exit but may crowd out voice. To assess the causal effects of competition on parental voice, we employ a robust two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences framework, comparing municipalities in Sweden that introduced competition with those that did not. Our findings indicate that school complaints decline following the introduction of competition. This decrease in voice is driven by neither a decrease in problems in school nor by changes in teaching staff quality or attrition. This suggests that the decrease in complaints is driven not by an increase in school quality but rather by a substitution from voice to exit.

Show more