Search

Varför kan teknik slå politik?

PublicationArticle (without peer review)
Christian Sandström, Christofer Laurell, Entreprenörskap, Företagandets villkor, Innovation, Jan Jörnmark, Jan Stenbeck, Kreativ förstörelse, Mirko Ernkvist, Teknik slår politik, Teknikskiften, Teknologi

Abstract

Jan Stenbeck sade att ”[t]eknik slår politik”. Hans egen gärning visar att nya företag ibland klarar av att inte bara introducera helt ny teknik, utan också att proaktivt förändra de formella och informella institutioner som styr en bransch. Med utgångspunkt i vår egen forskning på området diskuterar vi hur nya företag går tillväga för att genomdriva tekniska och institutionella omvälvningar. Våra studier av Uber, Optionsmäklarna (OM) och Axis Communications påvisar hur skillnader i kompetenser, incitament och snabbhet skapar möjligheter, samt att de nya aktörerna framgångsrikt kombinerar strategi i den kommersiella domänen med systematisk bearbetning av institutionerna.

Sandström, C. Ernkvist, M, Laurell, C. och Jörnmark, J. (2016). Varför kan teknik slå politik?, Ekonomisk debatt, 44(7), 42-53


Similar content

Third-Generation Innovation Policy: System Transformation or Reinforcing Business as Usual?
Book chapterPublication
Bergkvist, J. E., Moodysson, J., & Sandström, C.
Publication year

2022

Published in

Questioning the Entrepreneurial State, 201.

Abstract

There has been a shift in innovation policy in recent years toward more focus on systemic transformation and changed directionality. In this chapter, we describe a collection of challenges that such policies need to address. Based on a review of dominant frameworks regarding socio-technical transitions, we compare these theories with examples of innovation policy in different countries. Systemic transformation across an economy usually requires a process of creative destruction in which new competencies may be required, actors need to be connected in novel ways, and institutions may need to be changed. Our empirical illustrations show that support programs and initiatives across Europe do not always seem to result in such a process, as they include mechanisms favoring large, established firms and universities. These actors have often fine-tuned their activities and capabilities to the existing order, and therefore have few incentives to engage in renewal. As the incumbent actors also control superior financial and relational resources, there is a risk that they captivate innovation policies and thus reinforce established structures rather than contributing to systemic transformation.

Utvärderingar av näringspolitik – en intressekonflikt mellan myndigheter, konsult-företag, politik och skattebetalare?
Article (without peer review)Publication
Colin, E., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, C.
Publication year

2021

Published in

Ekon. Debatt, 49, 30-41.

Abstract

Antalet utvärderingar av ekonomisk politik ökar explosionsartat. Det finns dock få systematiska sammanställningar av de utvärderingar som görs och det saknas kunskap om hur utvärderare skiljer sig åt gällande metoder och slutsatser, inte minst inom näringspolitiken. Vi studerar utvärderingar av 110 näringspoli-tiska insatser 2009–19 genom att granska huruvida valet av utvärderare påver-kar utvärderingarnas resultat. Privata konsulter visar sig vara den vanligaste utvärderaren av näringspolitik och deras utvärderingar skiljer sig från andra utvärderare genom att vara övervägande mer positiva till de utvärderade insat-serna. Vi diskuterar intressekonflikter som kan antas föreligga mellan utvärde-rare, myndigheter, den politiska makten och allmänheten.

Colin, E., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, C. (2021). Utvärderingar av näringspolitik–en intressekonflikt mellan myndigheter, konsultföretag, politik och skattebetalare. Ekon. Debatt, 49, 30-41.

Technological Change and Industrial Transformation
BookPublication
Long, V. & Holmén, M.
Publication year

2021

Published in
Abstract

Industrial transformation is a research and teaching field with a focus on the phenomenon and mechanisms of industrial development and renewal. It concerns changes in economic activities caused by innovation, competition and collaboration, and has a rich heritage of evolutionary economics, institutional economics, industrial dynamics, technology history and innovation studies. It borrows concepts and models from the social sciences (sociology, history, political sciences, business/management, economics, behavioural sciences) and also from technology and engineering studies.
In this book, the authors present the key theories, frameworks and concepts of industrial transformation and use empirical cases to describe and explain the causes, processes and outcomes of transformation in the context of digitalization and sustainability. They stress that industrial transformation consists both of Darwinian “survival of the fittest” selection, and of intentional pursuits of innovation, and of industrial capabilities creation. The work argues that managing the global trends of transformation is not only about new technology and innovation: existing institutional settings and dynamic interactions between technological change, organizational adaptation and economic activities also have a profound impact on future trajectories.
The areas under investigation are of great relevance for strategic management decisions and industrial and technology policies, and understanding the mechanisms underlying transformation and sustainable growth.

Show more

Bankgiro: 512-6578