Ratio is an interdisciplinary research institute, with a research focus on the conditions of business and enterprise.

+4684415900

info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

Box 3203

103 64 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

About

  • About us
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Media
  • News archive
  • Cooperations
  • Eli F. Heckscher Lectures

Research

  • Areas
  • Labour Market Research
  • Competitiveness Research
  • Climate and Environmental Research
  • Ongoing research
  • Working Paper Series

Selected publication

Absolute income mobility and the effect of parent generation inequality: An extended decomposition approach
Liss, E., Korpi, M., & Wennberg, K.
People

Publications

  • Publications
  • Publications

Selected publication

No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion
Grafström, J., & Poudineh, R.
Search Swedish flag iconSV
Swedish flag iconSVSearch

About

  • About us

    • About
    • Contact us
  • Media

    • News archive
  • Cooperations

    • Eli F. Heckscher Lectures

Research

  • Areas

    • Labour Market Research
    • Competitiveness Research
    • Climate and Environmental Research
  • Ongoing research

    • Working Paper Series
  • People
  • Publications

    • Publications

      • Publications

    Ratio Working Paper No. 204: Growth Paths and Survival Chances

    PublicationWorking paper
    Alex Coad, David J. Storey, Företagandets villkor, Företagstillväxt, Gambler's ruin theory, Julian Frankish, Richard G. Roberts, Start-ups, Tillväxt
    Ratio Working Paper No. 204
    Download

    Abstract

    This paper links new firm survival with growth, with a focus on the patterns in firms’ growth paths. We theorise a Gambler’s Ruin framework by arguing that new rm performance is best modelled as a random walk process, but that survival is nonrandom and depends primarily on the stock of accumulated resources. A firm’s resources are either there when the business begins or are generated by successful periods `wins’. The empirical section tracks, over six years, the sales and survival/non-survival of 6,247 UK start-ups which all began trading in the same quarter of 2004. We do not find strong evidence in favour of a taxonomy of growth paths, because we observe that every possible growth path seems to occur with roughly equal probability. However, we observe that growth paths influence subsequent survival. Controlling for lagged size, we observe that longer lags of growth, and even start-up size, have signicant eects on survival.

    Related content: Growth paths and survival chances

    Coad, A., Frankish, J., Roberts, R.G. & Storey, D.J. (2012). Growth Paths and Survival Chances: An Application of Gambler’s Ruin Theory. Ratio Working Paper No. 204.

    Details

    Author

    Coad, A., Frankish, J., Roberts, R.G. & Storey, D.J.

    Publication year

    2012

    Published in

    Growth paths and survival chances


    Similar content

    Utvärderingar av näringspolitik – en intressekonflikt mellan myndigheter, konsult-företag, politik och skattebetalare?
    Article (without peer review)Publication
    Colin, E., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, C.
    Publication year

    2021

    Published in

    Ekon. Debatt, 49, 30-41.

    Abstract

    Antalet utvärderingar av ekonomisk politik ökar explosionsartat. Det finns dock få systematiska sammanställningar av de utvärderingar som görs och det saknas kunskap om hur utvärderare skiljer sig åt gällande metoder och slutsatser, inte minst inom näringspolitiken. Vi studerar utvärderingar av 110 näringspoli-tiska insatser 2009–19 genom att granska huruvida valet av utvärderare påver-kar utvärderingarnas resultat. Privata konsulter visar sig vara den vanligaste utvärderaren av näringspolitik och deras utvärderingar skiljer sig från andra utvärderare genom att vara övervägande mer positiva till de utvärderade insat-serna. Vi diskuterar intressekonflikter som kan antas föreligga mellan utvärde-rare, myndigheter, den politiska makten och allmänheten.

    Colin, E., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, C. (2021). Utvärderingar av näringspolitik–en intressekonflikt mellan myndigheter, konsultföretag, politik och skattebetalare. Ekon. Debatt, 49, 30-41.

    Tillväxt och hållbar utveckling i Sverige – fick Lindbeck (1974) rätt?
    Article (without peer review)Publication
    Grafström, J., Paulson, R., Sandström, C. & Wieslander, A.
    Publication year

    2020

    Published in

    Ekonomisk Debatt

    The openness of open innovation in ecosystems
    Article (with peer review)Publication
    Öberg, C., & Alexander, A.
    Publication year

    2019

    Published in

    Journal of Innovation & Knowledge

    Abstract

    Open innovation has rendered increased interest both in practice and research, and has expanded from dyadic transfers of ideas, to ecosystem levels. Knowledge is at the heart of open innovation, and this paper describes and discusses knowledge-transfer linkages for open innovation. It does so based on a literature review. The paper links together open innovation research with general management research to categorise and discuss linkages among parties in terms of their openness and how they relate to knowledge management. Conclusions indicate that openness needs to be considered in different dimensions that also links to different knowledge management outcomes. The paper’s contribution consists of how it connects open innovation research to the general management literature, and how it builds a practical understanding of how linkages between firms can be categorised to aid firms to consider which mechanisms they may choose and why.

    Show more