Search
Search

Working Paper No. 208. Institutional Ownership and Returns on Investment

PublicationWorking paper
Ägarskap, Bolagsstyrning, Daniel Wiberg, Företagandets villkor, Investering, Johan Eklund, Marginal q, Per-Olof Bjuggren, Performance, Tobin’s q
pob_je_dw_institutional_ownership_wp208
Download

Abstract

This paper examines how institutional investors influence investment decisions and returns on investment. To measure investment performance we used a measure of marginal q which measures the ratio of the investment returns to cost of capital. Institutional owners are found to have had a positive effect on performance, with a marginally diminishing effect of institutional ownership concentration. We used longitudinal data on Swedish firms for the period 1999-2005, during which their ownership structure underwent dramatic changes: Institutional investors increased their ownership share, while ownership by Swedish households decreased. However, controlling owners – often founding families – remained in control by resorting to extensive use of dual-class shares, control rights, which separate from cash-flow. This was an important determinant of firm performance, eradicating the positive influence of institutional ownership.

Related content: Institutional ownership and returns on investment

Bjuggren, P., Eklund, J. & Wiberg, D. (2013). ”Institutional Ownership and Returns on Investment”. Ratio Working Paper No. 208.

Similar content

Working Paper No. 355: The artificial intelligence (AI) data access regime: what are the factors affecting the access and sharing of industrial AI data?
Working paperPublication
Bjuggren, P.O. & Long, V.
Download
Publication year

2022

Published in

Bjuggren, P.O. & Long, V.

Abstract

This paper decomposes the factors that govern the access and sharing of machine-generated industrial data in the artificial intelligence era. Through a mapping of the key technological, institutional, and firm-level factors that affect the choice of governance structures, this study provides a synthesised view of AI data-sharing and coordination mechanisms. The question to be asked here is whether the hitherto de facto control—bilateral contracts and technical solution-dominating industrial practices in data sharing—can handle the long-run exchange needs or not.

The openness of open innovation in ecosystems
Article (with peer review)Publication
Öberg, C., & Alexander, A.
Publication year

2019

Published in

Journal of Innovation & Knowledge

Abstract

Open innovation has rendered increased interest both in practice and research, and has expanded from dyadic transfers of ideas, to ecosystem levels. Knowledge is at the heart of open innovation, and this paper describes and discusses knowledge-transfer linkages for open innovation. It does so based on a literature review. The paper links together open innovation research with general management research to categorise and discuss linkages among parties in terms of their openness and how they relate to knowledge management. Conclusions indicate that openness needs to be considered in different dimensions that also links to different knowledge management outcomes. The paper’s contribution consists of how it connects open innovation research to the general management literature, and how it builds a practical understanding of how linkages between firms can be categorised to aid firms to consider which mechanisms they may choose and why.

The role of innovation metrics in innovation systems
Article (with peer review)Publication
Öberg, C.
Publication year

2020

Published in

International Journal of Innovation

Abstract

In innovation systems, venture firms, incubators and science parks may interact with universities to achieve commercialisable output. These various parties are connected to different guiding performance metrics — measures on each party’s performance — that influence their behaviours. This paper illustrates and discusses the role of performance metrics among various parties in innovation systems connected with early research ideas from universities. The empirical part of the paper is based on interviews with 20 researchers and 10 representatives of various innovation system organisations in an EU-based research project. The paper points out how parties in the innovation process saw different reasons to participate which were strongly connected with how each party was evaluated and which caused sub-optimisation in behaviours. Previous research on innovation systems has not focused on the rationales and behaviours of parties. The focus on metrics targets an important point for understanding innovation processes involving several parties and specifically doing so for support organisations that cannot be measured on revenues or profits.

Show more