Ratio logo white

Ratio is an interdisciplinary research institute, with a research focus on the conditions of business and enterprise.

08-441 59 00info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

11359 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

PublicationsSeminarsPeople

Popular

News archive
Publications
Seminars
People
Start
About
Contact us
Labour market research
Competitiveness research
Climate and environmental research
Swedish flag iconPå svenska
PublicationWorking paper

Ratio Working Paper No. 375: Shifts in Doctoral Education: Analyzing the Rising Popularity of Job Market Papers in Swedish Economics Doctoral Dissertations

Download PDF

Abstract

This study examines the evolving structures of dissertations among 615 individuals who earned their PhDs in economics from Swedish institutions between 2010 and 2023. The findings indicate a shift away from traditional compilation dissertation, which typically consists of 4-5 papers intended for journal publication, towards the “Job Market Paper” model which consists of three papers. While over 70 percent of dissertations presented in 2010 were compilation dissertations, the number dropped to 43 percent in 2023. The structure of dissertations has varied over time, with a trend towards fewer included papers, peaking at 4.2 papers per dissertation in 2011 and dropping to 3.56 in 2023. Throughout the period, men wrote JMP dissertations slightly more frequently than women, with 40 percent compared to 35 percent for women. Many PhD students are unaware of how the format of their dissertation can affect future career prospects. The Swedish dissertation layout differs significantly between and within institutions. This shift is part of a wider adjustment in doctoral training, responding to increased international competition and changes in the academic job market. The study also discusses the implications of these trends for gender equality and institutional practices, suggesting that the evolving dissertation formats are a strategic response to both external market conditions and internal academic policies.

Grafström, J. & Roth, D. (2024). Shifts in Doctoral Education: Analyzing the Rising Popularity of Job Market Papers in Swedish Economics Doctoral Dissertations. Ratio Working Paper No. 375.

Details

Author
Grafström, J. & Roth, D. (2024). Shifts in Doctoral Education: Analyzing the Rising Popularity of Job Market Papers in Swedish Economics Doctoral Dissertations. Ratio Working Paper No. 375.
Publication year
2024
Published in

Ratio Working Paper Series.

Related

  • Ph.D. and vice CEO

    Jonas Grafström

    +46703475854jonas.grafstrom@ratio.se

Similar content

Article (with peer review)

Barriers to circularity in the metals industry: an analytical framework of feedback and lock-in effects

Grafström, J., Poelzer, G., & Pettersson, J.
Download

Publication year

2025

Published in

Mineral Economics.

Abstract

The metals sector faces multiple and interconnected barriers to achieving circularity. This study examines steel, aluminum, and copper to illustrate how challenges vary between metals. While copper can often be recycled without quality loss, steel and aluminum face alloy-related limitations that drive downcycling and quality degradation. Using a matrix-based analytical framework, the study maps the interactions between economic, technological, institutional, and social constraints, distinguishing between primary drivers, secondary effects, feedback loops, and lock-in mechanisms. The results show strong reinforcing links between economic, technological, and institutional domains, with social factors playing a more indirect role. These findings align with observed industry patterns while adding a structured, quantitative perspective. By clarifying how different barriers combine and reinforce one another, the analysis identifies priority areas for intervention to advance metals recycling and support the transition toward a more circular economy.

Working paper

Working Paper No. 387 Time as a Structural Barrier for a Circular Economy

Jonas Grafström
Download

Publication year

2025

Published in

Ratio Working Paper Series.

Abstract

Circular economy debates often acknowledge material lifespans and delays, but time is usually treated as a contextual issue rather than a structural barrier. The contribution is to reframe circular economy transitions as intertemporal processes by treating time as an endogenous structural barrier. A framework is developed that classifies goods into short-, medium-, and long-lived categories, demonstrating how lagged inflows and valuation biases suppress aggregate circularity even when technology improves. By making temporal mechanisms explicit, the analysis explains why indicators remain stagnant despite policy and efficiency gains. The contribution is to introduce time as an endogenous barrier, integrating insights from environmental and resource economics into circular economy theory and showing how delayed substitution shapes both firm investment and policy outcomes.

Working paper

Working Paper No. 385 The workload paradox: Will AIreduce academic labor?

Jonas Grafström
Download

Publication year

2025

Published in

Ratio Working Paper Series.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is reshaping academia, but instead of liberating scholars, AI might keep them running faster just to stay in place. This paper theoretically explores how AI increases institutional expectations rather than reducing workload. Using a formal workload model, the study examines how automation affects academic tasks, revealing that while AI streamlines some processes, it also creates new responsibilities in research, publishing, and administration. A case study illustrates how scholars experience rising pressures to verify AI-generated work, adapt to changing publication norms, and meet intensifying institutional demands. The findings suggest that AI’s role in academia is not one only of simplification, but acceleration—a race where efficiency gains are quickly absorbed, where the pursuit of academic excellence becomes ever more demanding, and where scholars must continuously push forward, not to advance, but merely to avoid falling behind.

Show more