Ratio light logo

Ratio är ett fristående forskningsinstitut som forskar om företagandets villkor.

08-441 59 00info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

11359 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

PublikationerEvenemangMedarbetare

Populärt

Unga forskare
Nyhetsarkiv
Publikationer
Evenemang
Medarbetare
Start
Publikationer
Forskning i korthet
Rapportserie arbetsmarknad
Arbetsmarknad
Klimat och miljö
Konkurrenskraft
Projekt
Evenemang
RatioTV
Ratio dialogue
Detta är Ratio
VD berättar
Styrelse
Ledning
Verksamhetsberättelse
Medarbetare
Forska hos oss
Kontakta oss
Om programmet
Stipendium för unga forskare
Praktik
Sommarassistent på Ratio
Eli F. Heckscher-föreläsning
AI-Econ Lab
Bli medlem
Press & media
Nyhetsbrev
Nyhetsarkiv
Vanliga frågor
Integritetspolicy
Engelska flaggan ikonIn English
PublikationArtikel (med peer review)

How Fares the Entrepreneurial State? Empirical Evidence of Mission-Led Innovation Projects Around the Globe

Sammanfattning

While considerable efforts have been made to conceptualize and outline the theoretical and normative logic of mission-oriented innovation policies and the role of the entrepreneurial state, there is a stark lack of empirical studies concerning how missions are designed and executed, and when they may work or do not. This monograph reviews theoretical rationales for mission-oriented innovation policy and provides an empirical overview of 30 articles which together cover 51 concluded or ongoing missions from around the world. We synthetize varieties of mission formulations, actors involved, and analyze characteristics of missions described as more or less failed or successful. Among the projects analyzed, many do not fulfill common definitions of “innovation missions.” Missions related to technological or agricultural innovations seem more often successful than broader types of missions aimed at social or ecological challenges, and challenges in the governance and evaluation of missions remain unresolved in the literature. None of the mission cases contain a cost-benefit analysis or takes opportunity cost into consideration.

Batbaatar, M., Larsson, J. P., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, K. (2024). How Fares the Entrepreneurial State? Empirical Evidence of Mission-Led Innovation Projects Around the Globe. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 19(8), 664-772.

Detaljer

Författare
Batbaatar, M., Larsson, J. P., Sandström, C., & Wennberg, K.
Publiceringsår
2024
Publicerat i

Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 19(8), 664-772.

Relaterat

  • Bild av Johan P Larsson, medarbetare på Ratio
    Ekonomie doktor

    Johan P Larsson

    johan.p.larsson@ratio.se
  • Bild av Karl Wennberg, medarbetare på Ratio
    Professor

    Karl Wennberg

    +46705105366karl.wennberg@ratio.se

Liknande innehåll

Artikel (med peer review)

Competition and Voice in Public Education: Evidence from Sweden

Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Lakomaa, E., & Brandén, M.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Education Finance and Policy, 1-40

Sammanfattning

While numerous studies examine the effects of school competition on student performance, little research directly addresses a key critique of competition: its potential to negatively affect parental engagement and voice. We draw on Hirschman’s theory of voice to argue that voucher-based school competition increases opportunities for exit but may crowd out voice. To assess the causal effects of competition on parental voice, we employ a robust two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences framework, comparing municipalities in Sweden that introduced competition with those that did not. Our findings indicate that school complaints decline following the introduction of competition. This decrease in voice is driven by neither a decrease in problems in school nor by changes in teaching staff quality or attrition. This suggests that the decrease in complaints is driven not by an increase in school quality but rather by a substitution from voice to exit.

Artikel (utan peer review)

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Entrepreneurship Research with Preregistrations, Registered Reports, and Registered Revisions: A Call for Papers

Fellnhofer, K., Wennberg, K., Allison, T. H., Arenius, P., Lévesque, M., Gish, J. J., & Pollack, J. M.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Sammanfattning

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) is committed to advancing transparency, replicability, credibility, and rigor in research. To support this commitment, we encourage authors to preregister their research plans, submit empirical studies as Registered Reports, and engage with our evolving editorial processes, such as Registered Revisions. Drawing on practices across multiple disciplines, we offer guidance for integrating these publication formats into our field. We also provide multiple resources to support authors in adopting these approaches and to address the unique challenges of applying such formats to, for example, secondary data. By more widely embracing the Registered Report approach, we envision a future for entrepreneurship research that is characterized by greater credibility, replicability, transparency, and scientific impact. In this editorial, we motivate and, hopefully, guide future work by making a specific call for manuscripts for a virtual special issue of ETP focused on Registered Reports, strengthening ETP’s longstanding commitment to methodological innovation. We offer a prospective vision—what we believe would be good for future literature—and our aim is to empower scholars to proactively shape new theoretical and empirical foundations in entrepreneurship research that enhance the credibility and replicability of entrepreneurship research.

Artikel (med peer review)

Knowledge Accumulation: Entrepreneurial Opportunity and Uncertainty

Chrisman, J. J., Jack, S., Kellermanns, F. W., Rosenbusch, N., & Wennberg, K.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 50(1), 3–20.

Sammanfattning

Based on the idea that entrepreneurship is fundamentally about the pursuit of opportunity in the presence of uncertainty, this article introduces the second special issue on knowledge accumulation in entrepreneurship. The special issue first summarizes and discusses four articles that deal with who pursues opportunities and the types of opportunities pursued (nascent entrepreneurship; user entrepreneurship; returnee entrepreneurship; destructive entrepreneurship), and then summarizes and discusses four articles that deal with the nature of uncertainty and methods entrepreneurs use to cope with uncertainty (Knightian uncertainty; entrepreneurial metacognition; entrepreneurial experimentation; network agency).

Visa fler