Ratio Working Paper No. 323: Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Theory-Testing Entrepreneurship Research

PublikationWorking paper
causal inference; researcher degrees of freedom, publishing in JBV, Research design, theory-testing research

Sammanfattning

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss methodological advancements to enhance quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research. As the impact of entrepreneurship scholarship accelerates and deepens, our methods must keep pace to continue shaping theory, policy, and practice. Like our sister fields in business, entrepreneurship is coming to terms with the replication and credibility crisis in the social sciences, forcing the field to revisit commonly-held assumptions that limit the promise and prospect of our scholarship. Thus, we provide suggestions for reviewers and editors to identify concerns in empirical work, and to guide authors in improving their analyses and research designs. We hope that our editorial provides useful and actionable guidance for entrepreneurship researchers submitting theory-testing papers to Journal of Business Venturing.

Wennberg, K. & Anderson, B. (2019). Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Theory-Testing Entrepreneurship Research. Working Paper no. 323. Stockholm: Ratio.


Liknande innehåll

Ratio Working Paper No. 322: Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Exploratory Entrepreneurship Research
Working paperPublikation
Wennberg, K. & Anderson, B.
Publiceringsår

2019

Publicerat i

Ratio Working Paper

Sammanfattning

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss ways to enhance exploratory quantitative studies in entrepreneurship. We use examples from entrepreneurship research and other scientific fields to illustrate the advantages of graphical data display for both exploratory purposes and post hoc tests. We provide suggestions for authors, reviewers, and editors on ways to enhance the transparency, accuracy, and pedagogical presentation of quantitative data in papers with the explicit purpose of illuminating emerging and important entrepreneurship phenomena. Our hope is that we spark a conversation among entrepreneurship scholars about the state of our empirical work and the possibilities that lie ahead to enhance exploratory entrepreneurship research.

Visa fler