Ratio light logo

Ratio är ett fristående forskningsinstitut som forskar om företagandets villkor.

08-441 59 00info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

11359 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

PublikationerEvenemangMedarbetare

Populärt

Unga forskare
Nyhetsarkiv
Publikationer
Evenemang
Medarbetare
Start
Publikationer
Forskning i korthet
Rapportserie arbetsmarknad
Arbetsmarknad
Klimat och miljö
Konkurrenskraft
Projekt
Evenemang
RatioTV
Ratio dialogue
Detta är Ratio
VD berättar
Styrelse
Ledning
Verksamhetsberättelse
Medarbetare
Forska hos oss
Kontakta oss
Om programmet
Stipendium för unga forskare
Praktik
Sommarassistent på Ratio
Eli F. Heckscher-föreläsning
AI-Econ Lab
Bli medlem
Press & media
Nyhetsbrev
Nyhetsarkiv
Vanliga frågor
Integritetspolicy
Engelska flaggan ikonIn English
PublikationArtikel (med peer review)

Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries

Sammanfattning

Abstract

We analyze the adoption of nonpharmaceutical interventions in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given the complexity associated with pandemic decisions, governments are faced with the dilemma of how to act quickly when their core decision-making processes are based on deliberations balancing political considerations. Our findings show that, in times of severe crisis, governments follow the lead of others and base their decisions on what other countries do. Governments in countries with a stronger democratic structure are slower to react in the face of the pandemic but are more sensitive to the influence of other countries. We provide insights for research on international policy diffusion and research on the political consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Arora-Jonsson, S., Stefan & Lindberg, S.I. (2020). Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 117(35), 21201 – 21208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010625117

Detaljer

Författare
Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Arora-Jonsson, S., Stefan & Lindberg, S.I.
Publiceringsår
2020
Publicerat i

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Relaterat

  • Bild av Karl Wennberg, medarbetare på Ratio
    Professor

    Karl Wennberg

    +46705105366karl.wennberg@ratio.se

Liknande innehåll

Artikel (med peer review)

Competition and Voice in Public Education: Evidence from Sweden

Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Lakomaa, E., & Brandén, M.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Education Finance and Policy, 1-40

Sammanfattning

While numerous studies examine the effects of school competition on student performance, little research directly addresses a key critique of competition: its potential to negatively affect parental engagement and voice. We draw on Hirschman’s theory of voice to argue that voucher-based school competition increases opportunities for exit but may crowd out voice. To assess the causal effects of competition on parental voice, we employ a robust two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences framework, comparing municipalities in Sweden that introduced competition with those that did not. Our findings indicate that school complaints decline following the introduction of competition. This decrease in voice is driven by neither a decrease in problems in school nor by changes in teaching staff quality or attrition. This suggests that the decrease in complaints is driven not by an increase in school quality but rather by a substitution from voice to exit.

Artikel (utan peer review)

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Entrepreneurship Research with Preregistrations, Registered Reports, and Registered Revisions: A Call for Papers

Fellnhofer, K., Wennberg, K., Allison, T. H., Arenius, P., Lévesque, M., Gish, J. J., & Pollack, J. M.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Sammanfattning

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) is committed to advancing transparency, replicability, credibility, and rigor in research. To support this commitment, we encourage authors to preregister their research plans, submit empirical studies as Registered Reports, and engage with our evolving editorial processes, such as Registered Revisions. Drawing on practices across multiple disciplines, we offer guidance for integrating these publication formats into our field. We also provide multiple resources to support authors in adopting these approaches and to address the unique challenges of applying such formats to, for example, secondary data. By more widely embracing the Registered Report approach, we envision a future for entrepreneurship research that is characterized by greater credibility, replicability, transparency, and scientific impact. In this editorial, we motivate and, hopefully, guide future work by making a specific call for manuscripts for a virtual special issue of ETP focused on Registered Reports, strengthening ETP’s longstanding commitment to methodological innovation. We offer a prospective vision—what we believe would be good for future literature—and our aim is to empower scholars to proactively shape new theoretical and empirical foundations in entrepreneurship research that enhance the credibility and replicability of entrepreneurship research.

Artikel (med peer review)

Knowledge Accumulation: Entrepreneurial Opportunity and Uncertainty

Chrisman, J. J., Jack, S., Kellermanns, F. W., Rosenbusch, N., & Wennberg, K.

Publiceringsår

2026

Publicerat i

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 50(1), 3–20.

Sammanfattning

Based on the idea that entrepreneurship is fundamentally about the pursuit of opportunity in the presence of uncertainty, this article introduces the second special issue on knowledge accumulation in entrepreneurship. The special issue first summarizes and discusses four articles that deal with who pursues opportunities and the types of opportunities pursued (nascent entrepreneurship; user entrepreneurship; returnee entrepreneurship; destructive entrepreneurship), and then summarizes and discusses four articles that deal with the nature of uncertainty and methods entrepreneurs use to cope with uncertainty (Knightian uncertainty; entrepreneurial metacognition; entrepreneurial experimentation; network agency).

Visa fler
Nyhetsartikel

What drives OECD countries to adopt COVID-19 restrictive policies? New publication by Wennberg et al

For English, please see further below. Vad förklarar OECD-ländernas olika beslut om lockdowns, skolstängningar m.m. under covid-19-pandemin? Inom en två veckor lång period antog närmare 80 procent av OECD-länderna samma icke-farmaceutiska åtgärder såsom skolstängningar och...

Publicerat 12 augusti 2020
Läs hela