Ratio Working Paper No. 353: From free competition to fair competition on the European internal market

PublikationWorking paper
competition, European Union, Nils Karlson, regulation

Sammanfattning

This paper investigates whether an increased use and reinterpretation of what has been called “fair competition” has occurred at the expense of “free competition” among the central institutions of the European Union. We are also interested in assessing how frequently these terms have been used by the various EU institutions over time.

We have empirically examined this through a quantitative survey of more than 12,000 public documents, out of totally 242 000 documents containing 630 million words, in the EUR-lex database over the last 50 years, from 1970 to 2020. Our conclusion is that the emphasis of the common policies in the EU is likely to have shifted from free competition and an open market economy to “fair competition” in the sense of a level playing field, in official EU documents, such as treaties, EU acts institutions, preparatory documents relating to EU directives and recommendations including motions and resolutions, case law and more.

The European Commission has been a driving force in this development, followed closely by the European Parliament and subsequently by the Council of Ministers. This change entails a risk that the regulation of the European internal market has shifted so that the dynamics of the internal market and thus the EU’s competitiveness will weaken. The change also entails a centralization of decisions at EU level at the expense of the Member States.

Karlson, N., Herold, T. & Dalbard, K. More from less? From free competition to fair competition on the European internal market. Ratio Working Paper No. 353. Stockholm: Ratio.


Liknande innehåll

Statskonst på Utbildningsdepartementet
BokkapitelPublikation
Karlson, N.
Publiceringsår

2024

Publicerat i

Per Unckel – Den pragmatiske visionären som förändrade Sverige

Sammanfattning

Nils Karlson, professor i statsvetenskap och Ratios grundare, skriver om tidigare utbildnings- och forskningsminister Per Unckels (M) omstöpning av det svenska universitets- och högskolesystemet i början av 1990-talet, i antologin Per Unckel – Den pragmatiske visionären som förändrade Sverige (Förlagsaktiebolaget Svensk Tidskrift).

Läs mer om boken här.

Reviving Classical Liberalism Against Populism
BokPublikation
Karlson, N. (2024). Reviving Classical Liberalism Against Populism. Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
Publiceringsår

2024

Publicerat i

Palgrave Macmillan Cham.

Sammanfattning

How can we fight back against the populist threat to liberty, free markets, and the open society?

This open access book by Nils Karlson explores the strategies used by left- and right-wing populists to make populism intelligible, recognizable, and contestable. Karlson argues that to fight back requires the revival of liberalism itself by defending and developing the liberal institutions, the liberal spirit, liberal narratives, and liberal statecraft. The book presents a synthesized explanatory model for how populists promote autocratization through the deliberate polarization of society and traces the ideational roots of the core populist ideas that form a collectivistic identity politics. Written within the tradition of political theory and institutional economics, this book uses a wide variety of sources, including results and analyses from social psychology, ethics, law, and history.

The book is open source and can be downloaded through the link below.

Sympatiåtgärdernas logik, praktik och konsekvenser
RapporterPublikation
Karlson, N.
Publiceringsår

2024

Publicerat i

Ratios arbetsmarknadsserie.

Sammanfattning

I Sverige är möjligheten att ta till sympatiåtgärder såväl generös som omstridd. Vissa menar att sympatiåtgärderna bidrar till att vårt land har få utbrutna arbetsmarknadskonflikter medan kritikerna hävdar att regelverket är förlegat, med hänsyn till nutidens sammankopplade värdekedjor och global konkurrens. Klart är dock att sympatiåtgärder drabbar parter som inte är direkt berörda av en konflikt, något som på senare tid varit särskilt uppmärksammat i och med Teslakonflikten.

I rapporten “Sympatiåtgärdernas logik, praktik och konsekvenser” kartlägger Nils Karlson, professor i statsvetenskap, sympatiåtgärdernas historia, logik, praktik och konsekvenser. Följande frågor berörs: Vilka är sympatiåtgärdernas avsedda och oavsedda effekter? Vilka kostnader är förenade med sympatiåtgärdernas användning? Och finns det skäl att förändra regelverket kring dessa stridsåtgärder?

Visa fler