Ratio light logo

Ratio är ett fristående forskningsinstitut som forskar om företagandets villkor.

08-441 59 00info@ratio.se

802002-5212

Sveavägen 59 4trp

11359 Stockholm

Bankgiro: 512-6578

PublikationerEvenemangMedarbetare

Populärt

Unga forskare
Nyhetsarkiv
Publikationer
Evenemang
Medarbetare
Start
Publikationer
Forskning i korthet
Rapportserie arbetsmarknad
Arbetsmarknad
Klimat och miljö
Konkurrenskraft
Projekt
Evenemang
RatioTV
Ratio dialogue
Detta är Ratio
VD berättar
Styrelse
Ledning
Verksamhetsberättelse
Medarbetare
Forska hos oss
Kontakta oss
Om programmet
Stipendium för unga forskare
Praktik
Sommarassistent på Ratio
Eli F. Heckscher-föreläsning
AI-Econ Lab
Bli medlem
Press & media
Nyhetsbrev
Nyhetsarkiv
Vanliga frågor
Integritetspolicy
Engelska flaggan ikonIn English
PublikationArtikel (med peer review)

Assessing user perceptions of the interplay between the sharing, access, platform and community‐based economies

Sammanfattning

Purpose
Digitally intermediated peer-to-peer exchanges have accelerated in occurrence, and as a consequence, they have introduced an increased pluralism of connotations. Accordingly, this paper aims to assess user perceptions of the interplay between the sharing, access, platform, and community-based economies.

Design/methodology/approach
The sharing, access, platform, and community-based economies have been systematically tracked in the social media landscape using Social Media Analytics (SMA). In doing so, a total material of 62,855 publicly posted user-generated content concerning the four respective economies were collected and analyzed.

Findings
Even though the sharing economy has been conceptually argued to be interlinked with the access, platform, and community-based economies, the empirical results of the study do not validate this interlinkage. Instead, the results regarding user perceptions in social media show that the sharing, access, platform, and community-based economies manifest as clearly separated.

Originality/value
This paper contributes to existing literature by offering an empirical validation, as well as an in-depth understanding, of the sharing economy’s interlinkage to other economies, along with the extent to which the overlaps between these economies manifest in social media.

Geissinger, A., Laurell, C., Öberg, C., Sandström, C. & Suseno, Y. (2020). Assessing user perceptions of the interplay between the sharing, access, platform and community‐based economies. Information Technology & People, 33(3), 1037-1051.

Detaljer

Författare
Geissinger, A., Laurell, C., Öberg, C., Sandström, C. & Suseno, Y.
Publiceringsår
2020
Publicerat i

Information Technology & People

Relaterat

  • Associerad forskare

    Andrea Geissinger

    andrea.geissinger@ratio.se
  • Professor

    Christina Öberg

    christina.oberg@kau.se

Liknande innehåll

Rapporter

Hur påverkar skatt på förvärvs­inkomster svensk innovationskraft?

Ejermo, O., Halvarsson, D., & Hansson, Å.
Ladda ner

Publiceringsår

2025

Publicerat i

Tillväxtanalys.

Sammanfattning

Rapporten analyserar hur beskattningen av förvärvsinkomster påverkar Sveriges innovationsförmåga. Fokus ligger på hur marginalskatter och skattesystemets utformning påverkar humankapital, entreprenörskap och incitament till kunskapsintensivt arbete. Resultaten visar att höga skatter på arbetsinkomster riskerar att dämpa innovation genom minskad rörlighet, svagare incitament för utbildning och svårigheter att attrahera och behålla högkvalificerad arbetskraft. Rapporten diskuterar därmed skattepolitikens betydelse för långsiktig produktivitet och ekonomisk tillväxt.

Bokkapitel

Third-Generation Innovation Policy: System Transformation or Reinforcing Business as Usual?

Bergkvist, J. E., Moodysson, J., & Sandström, C.

Publiceringsår

2022

Publicerat i

Questioning the Entrepreneurial State, 201.

Sammanfattning

There has been a shift in innovation policy in recent years toward more focus on systemic transformation and changed directionality. In this chapter, we describe a collection of challenges that such policies need to address. Based on a review of dominant frameworks regarding socio-technical transitions, we compare these theories with examples of innovation policy in different countries. Systemic transformation across an economy usually requires a process of creative destruction in which new competencies may be required, actors need to be connected in novel ways, and institutions may need to be changed. Our empirical illustrations show that support programs and initiatives across Europe do not always seem to result in such a process, as they include mechanisms favoring large, established firms and universities. These actors have often fine-tuned their activities and capabilities to the existing order, and therefore have few incentives to engage in renewal. As the incumbent actors also control superior financial and relational resources, there is a risk that they captivate innovation policies and thus reinforce established structures rather than contributing to systemic transformation.

Artikel (med peer review)

Disruptive and paradoxical roles in the sharing economies

Öberg, C.

Publiceringsår

2021

Publicerat i

International Journal of Innovation Management

Sammanfattning

The sharing economy could be said to disrupt who does what in exchanges. This paper categorises the roles played by users, providers, and platforms in different interpretations of the sharing economy. It asks: What different roles do the users, providers, and platforms play in the sharing economy? And: How do the roles differ in various interpretations of the sharing economy? The paper classifies the different interpretations based on their market/non-market logic and concludes that roles are more extensive for users and providers in non-market logic interpretations, while market logic suggests that the platform acts more roles. The user is, despite the peer-to-peer connotation of the sharing economy, often quite passive. Contributions are made to the emerging literature on the sharing economy through highlighting its many different interpretations, where roles help to systematise these. The paper furthermore contributes to the literature on roles through highlighting them as transitory and expanding beyond expectations related to digitalisation. Practically, the systematisation of roles helps to navigate among various business model designs and makes informed decisions when launching platforms in the sharing economy. Additionally, the focus on roles raises important questions on risk sharing, resource provisions, and the creation of value for each participating party.

Visa fler