Sök

Working Paper No. 73. Äganderättens tre grundläggande dimensioner

PublikationWorking paper
Äganderätt, Företagandets villkor, Nils Karlson, Valfrihet
Working Paper No. 73.
Ladda ner

Sammanfattning

Uppsatsen analyserar äganderättsbegreppet och definierar äganderätt som ett knippe av rättigheter där de viktigaste ingående rättigheterna är följande: användarfrihet – rätt att fritt nyttja och besluta över egendomen efter eget gottfinnande, inklusive rätt till den avkastning som egendomen genererar; avtalsfrihet – rätt att fritt överföra rättigheter, helt eller delvis, exempelvis genom köp eller hyra; samt rätt till säkerhet – rätt till skydd mot stöld, intrång, skadegörelse, konfiskation, etc. Dessutom diskuteras äganderättens viktigaste konsekvenser, nämligen marknadsekonomin och den ekonomiska utveckling som denna åstadkommer, samt följderna av att begränsa äganderätten.

Related content: Äganderättens tre grundläggande dimensioner

Karlson, N. (2005). Äganderättens tre grundläggande dimensioner. Ratio Working Paper No. 73.

Baserat på innehåll

Ratio Working Paper No. 349: Industrial conflict in essential services in a new era – Swedish rules in a comparative perspective
Working paperPublikation
Karlson, N.
Publiceringsår

2021

Publicerat i

Ratio Working Paper

Sammanfattning

This paper examines whether the Swedish regulatory system of dealing with industrial conflicts that affect essential services need an update or reform. Are the existing rules effective in a world where many essential services are upheld by many interdependent agents in complex systems where every single node becomes critical for the functioning of the system, and where the essential service activities could be either private or public? A comparative study is conducted with the corresponding regulatory systems of the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark.
The conclusion is that Sweden is a special case. The Swedish protection against and readiness in dealing with societally harmful industrial conflicts in essential services is weaker than in the countries of comparison. Just as in relation to other threats to essential services, it is not sustainable to claim that just because such a threat is not currently present, there would be no need for preparedness.
There are many alternative ways to handle this. Desirable methods should both prevent harmful conflicts from erupting and end conflicts that have grown harmful to society at a later stage. The labour market organisations should have a mutual interest in reforming the rules.

Ratio Working Paper No. 349: Industrial conflict in essential services in a new era – Swedish rules in a comparative perspective
Working paperPublikation
Karlson, N.
Publiceringsår

2021

Publicerat i

Ratio Working Paper

Sammanfattning

This paper examines whether the Swedish regulatory system of dealing with industrial conflicts that affect essential services need an update or reform. Are the existing rules effective in a world where many essential services are upheld by many interdependent agents in complex systems where every single node becomes critical for the functioning of the system, and where the essential service activities could be either private or public? A comparative study is conducted with the corresponding regulatory systems of the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark.
The conclusion is that Sweden is a special case. The Swedish protection against and readiness in dealing with societally harmful industrial conflicts in essential services is weaker than in the countries of comparison. Just as in relation to other threats to essential services, it is not sustainable to claim that just because such a threat is not currently present, there would be no need for preparedness.
There are many alternative ways to handle this. Desirable methods should both prevent harmful conflicts from erupting and end conflicts that have grown harmful to society at a later stage. The labour market organisations should have a mutual interest in reforming the rules.

Ratio Working Paper No 343: Populism, Liberalism and the Quest for Meaning and Community
Working paperPublikation
Karlson, N.
Publiceringsår

2020

Sammanfattning

Liberalism is losing ground, while populist or even authoritarian nationalist regimes are on the rise. This paper argues that the causes of the decline are, at least partly, endogenous, that a narrow focus on economic efficiency and the successful critique of socialism and the welfare state have created an idea vacuum that has opened up for these illiberal tendencies. The conclusion is that a central challenge for liberalism is to offer a comprehensive idea and narrative about meaning and community that is not socialistic, conservative or nationalistic, but distinctly liberal, to counter these developments.

Visa fler

Ratio är ett fristående forskningsinstitut som forskar om hur företagandets villkor kan utvecklas och förbättras.

Sveavägen 59 4trp

Box 3203

103 64 Stockholm

Postgiro: 382621-1

|

Bankgiro: 512-6578